Scientific Planning Committee

Irene Lara-Corrales MD, MSc
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatrics,
University of Toronto
Staff Physician,
Division of Paediatric Dermatology,
The Hospital for Sick Children

Rebecca Levy MD, FRCPC
Assistant Professor,
Department of Paediatrics,
University of Toronto
Staff Physician,
Division of Paediatric Dermatology,
The Hospital for Sick Children

Miriam Hansen MD, FRCPC
Consulting Pediatrics
Medical Director, Pediatric Asthma Clinic, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Associate Lecturer, University of Toronto

Faith Cormier MD
Clinical Fellow
Division of Paediatric Dermatology,
The Hospital for Sick Children

Anne Goodfellow MD, CCFP, HBSc, MSc
Family Physician with Focused Practice Designation in Dermatology
The Lynde Institute for Dermatology

Rose Young RN
Division of Paediatric Dermatology,
The Hospital for Sick Children

Faculty Disclosure

It is the policy of the University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Continuing Professional Development to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its individually accredited or jointly accredited educational programs.

Speakers and/or planning committee members, participating in University of Toronto accredited programs, are expected to disclose to the program audience any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of the continuing education program. This pertains but is not limited to relationships within the last FIVE (5) years with not-for-profit organizations, pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or other corporations whose products or services are related to the subject matter of the presentation topic.

The intent of this policy is not to prevent a speaker with a potential conflict of interest from making a presentation. It is merely intended that any potential conflict should be identified openly so that the listeners may form their own judgments about the presentation with the full disclosure of facts.

It remains for the audience to determine whether the speaker’s outside interests may reflect a possible bias in either the exposition or the conclusions presented.