Our program co-directors are both certified coaches with extensive experience in continuing professional development and coaching in the healthcare context.
Jane Tipping MADEd, MCC
Jane Tipping is an Adult Education Specialist with a solid background in continuing professional development. She has extensive experience in faculty development, continuing professional education, instructional design, coaching, and program evaluation. Over the past five years Jane has developed a focused expertise in coaching and training others to coach. She holds the designations of Master Certified Coach, Professional Certified Coach Marker, and Mentor Coach with the International Coach Federation.
Anne Matlow MSc, MD, FRCPC, ACC
Anne Matlow brings her decades of experience as an academic Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases physician, medical educator, and leader to her role as a Certified Executive Coach. With a focus on healthcare, Anne works with health professionals across executive and education branches to create a nurturing coaching culture that allows everyone to feel seen, heard, and valued. She is also a Principal at Aurealis Global Leadership Coaching.
Faculty Disclosure
It is the policy of the University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Continuing Professional Development to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its individually accredited or jointly accredited educational programs.
Speakers and/or planning committee members, participating in University of Toronto accredited programs, are expected to disclose to the program audience any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of the continuing education program. This pertains but is not limited to relationships within the last FIVE (5) years with not-for-profit organizations, pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or other corporations whose products or services are related to the subject matter of the presentation topic.
The intent of this policy is not to prevent a speaker with a potential conflict of interest from making a presentation. It is merely intended that any potential conflict should be identified openly so that the listeners may form their own judgments about the presentation with the full disclosure of facts.
It remains for the audience to determine whether the speaker’s outside interests may reflect a possible bias in either the exposition or the conclusions presented.